Pressure & Buoyancy
One number decides sinking and floating, and neither the object's weight nor its depth is anywhere in it.
Introduction
Sink or float
A steel ship floats. A steel bolt dropped over its side sinks: same metal, same ocean. So weight does not decide sinking and floating. One number does.
Two cubes of the same wood are lowered into water. One has twice the side length, so eight times the volume and the mass. What happens?
What holds the block up
Everything about buoyancy comes from one fact: pressure in a fluid grows with depth. A depth below the surface, the fluid above is a column of weight per unit area, so
Set the buoyant force equal to the weight, and a floating block rides with a fraction of itself under. If comes out above one, it sinks: compare the densities.
Depth does not enter into it
The that cancelled in the derivation is worth a second look.
The iron block is fully submerged and still sinking. As it descends the rest of the way to the floor, what happens to the buoyant force on it?
Apparent weight
That number is the apparent weight, : what a scale under the block would read. It is why a boulder you cannot budge on land can be rolled along a riverbed, and why you feel light in a swimming pool.
Set the tank fluid to air and drop the wooden cube. What do the readouts show once it is lying on the floor?
What comes next
You floated lead, hovered a cube in mid-water and measured buoyancy in air: the fluid pushed aside sets the force, and the object's weight and depth do not. Everything here was static, with pressure set by depth alone. Set the same fluid moving and the pressure starts to depend on how fast it is going.
Ideas this lesson took on
Each of these is a common intuition the lesson put to the test. If one still feels right, the section that tests it is worth another look.
- “Heavy objects sink and light ones float”
- “The bigger block floats higher”
- “The buoyant force grows as you go deeper”
- “Air exerts no buoyant force”
Finished with this lesson?
Progress is stored on this device only. There is no account and nothing is sent anywhere.
Research behind this lesson
- Heron et al. 2003: The companion paper: tutorials built directly on the documented difficulties, having students reason about the displaced fluid and the forces on it rather than be handed B = ρgV, proved effective, and K–8 teachers who worked through the same materials outperformed introductory physics students on some tasks.
- Loverude et al. 2003: After standard instruction in hydrostatics, many science and engineering majors still could not predict or explain whether a simple object would sink or float. Some of the difficulties were specific to the buoyant force; many others traced back to ideas, mass, volume, density, the forces a fluid exerts, that instruction assumes are already secure before hydrostatics begins.
- Loverude et al. 2010: Written questions and interviews found that many undergraduates never build a correct account of pressure in a static liquid: in particular they struggle to identify the forces acting on the liquid and to relate those forces to pressure.