Lenses, Mirrors & Images
Where the picture actually is when there is no screen to catch it, and what covering half the lens does to it.
Introduction
A magnifying glass can throw a sunlit window onto a sheet of paper, upside down. So where was that picture before the paper arrived?
A lens projects a sharp image of a lit arrow onto a screen. You slide a card over the top half of the lens. What happens to the image?
One point, one image point
The lens does not make the image, the way a printer makes a page. It only bends every ray that reaches it. The image is where the rays from one point of the object meet again, out in the air.
Three rays are enough
Rays from one point of the object all meet at its image point. Three are easy to draw:
- In parallel to the axis, out through the far focus.
- Through the centre, straight on.
- In through the near focus, out parallel.
Any two cross there.
Does the image need a screen?
The lens projects a sharp image onto a screen 15 cm behind it. You take the screen away. What is now where the screen used to be?
Images you cannot catch
Bring the object closer than the focal length and the rays leaving the lens spread apart. They never cross, so there is nowhere to put a screen.
The dashed backward extensions meet at a point, bigger and the right way up: a virtual image. The light reaching your eye behaves as if it came from there. It did not.
A magnifying glass held 6 cm from a stamp (f = 10 cm) shows a large, upright stamp. Where is that enlarged stamp, and what is there?
Mirrors keep the same equation
A concave mirror obeys the same equation as a converging lens. Only the outgoing side changes: light comes back, so a real image forms in front of the mirror, and a virtual one behind the glass.
A concave mirror has f = 10 cm. You put an object 6 cm in front of it. What do you get?
What comes next
Every ray in this lesson travelled in a straight line between surfaces. Next, light that will not: two slits, and a pattern that rays cannot explain.
Ideas this lesson took on
Each of these is a common intuition the lesson put to the test. If one still feels right, the section that tests it is worth another look.
- “Covering half the lens removes half the image”
- “Without a screen there is no image”
- “A virtual image is imaginary, so it is not anywhere”
- “A concave mirror can only make real images”
Finished with this lesson?
Progress is stored on this device only. There is no account and nothing is sent anywhere.
Research behind this lesson
- Goldberg & McDermott 1986: Individual demonstration interviews with a real plane mirror: students who could state the law of reflection could not use it to say what an observer standing in a particular place would actually see, and did not connect the lines of a ray diagram to the light that has to arrive at an eye.
- Goldberg & McDermott 1987: In interviews built round a lit bulb, a converging lens and a screen, only about a third of students recognised that even a small part of a lens still forms the whole image; the most popular answer to covering half the lens was "half a lens, half an image", and having just completed the optics course made no difference to the result.
- McDermott & Shaffer 2002: A research-validated elicit–confront–resolve sequence: surface the intuitive belief explicitly, put it in direct conflict with evidence, then help rebuild. Skipping the confrontation leaves the original belief intact alongside the new formalism.