Momentum & Collisions
What survives a collision, what doesn't, and why the centre of mass never notices.
Introduction
The forces in a collision are enormous, complicated and over in milliseconds, and you can predict the outcome without knowing any of them.
Two lumps of clay collide head-on and stick together, coming to a complete stop. Kinetic energy was clearly lost. What happened to the momentum?
Stop them dead
Momentum is mass times velocity, , and it has a direction. Add the momenta of everything in the collision: that total comes out exactly as it went in, whether the carts bounce apart or stick.
Where conservation comes from
The second law is a statement about momentum, . By the third law the carts push on each other equally and oppositely, for the same time, so their momentum changes cancel:
A kg cart moving at m/s hits a kg cart at rest, and they stick together. How fast do they move off?
Bounce, or stick
Set the restitution to 0.5. What is conserved and what is not?
What comes next
You stopped two carts dead by balancing their momenta, and made a collision shed half its energy while its momentum held. Everything so far has treated objects as points; next we let them spin, and a hoop and a sphere released from the same height turn out not to arrive together.
Ideas this lesson took on
Each of these is a common intuition the lesson put to the test. If one still feels right, the section that tests it is worth another look.
- “Momentum is lost when a collision is inelastic”
- “The heavier object exerts the larger force”
- “Kinetic energy is always conserved”
Finished with this lesson?
Progress is stored on this device only. There is no account and nothing is sent anywhere.
Research behind this lesson
- Lawson & McDermott 1987: Students who could state both theorems often could not apply them, and frequently treated energy as a substance that gets used up rather than a quantity that is transferred.
- Hestenes et al. 1992: A 29-item instrument, expanded to 30 in the 1995 revision, whose wrong answers are all documented student beliefs. It exposed how little conceptual understanding traditional courses were producing, and reoriented a generation of physics teaching.
- Halloun & Hestenes 1985: Students arrive with a coherent, stable, Aristotelian-flavoured theory of motion. Conventional instruction leaves much of it intact: the formalism is learned alongside the intuition rather than in place of it.